<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Dnd on Pensées de Michel</title>
    <link>/tags/dnd/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Dnd on Pensées de Michel</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&lt;a href=&#34;https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;CC BY 4.0&lt;/a&gt;</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/dnd/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>The D&amp;D alignments of developers w.r.t. AI</title>
      <link>/posts/2026-04-01-dnd-alignment-of-developers-wrt-ai/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/posts/2026-04-01-dnd-alignment-of-developers-wrt-ai/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have a more serious post coming, but I figured better not risk being confused for a bad joke (especially given the &lt;a href=&#34;https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/67RIQBACH6FN6FGOTJPAXHX4YL5Q2HPG/&#34;&gt;chardet controversy&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;So instead - something I&amp;rsquo;ve been promising some people I would write about &amp;hellip; the idea that we can classify developers based on their attitude towards (generative) AI, a.k.a. LLMs.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Mind you, don&amp;rsquo;t take this too seriously, and especially, don&amp;rsquo;t feel singled out. I&amp;rsquo;m making fun of myself too here! Suggestions for improvements welcome, of course.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
