<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Llm on Pensées de Michel</title>
    <link>/tags/llm/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Llm on Pensées de Michel</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>&lt;a href=&#34;https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/&#34; target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noopener&#34;&gt;CC BY 4.0&lt;/a&gt;</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="/tags/llm/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Sandogasa, now for EPEL and CentOS SIG workflows too!</title>
      <link>/posts/2026-04-02-sandogasa-for-epel-and-centos-sigs/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/posts/2026-04-02-sandogasa-for-epel-and-centos-sigs/</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Caveat lector&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This post discusses tools reluctantly written with AI assistance. If you don&amp;rsquo;t entertain&#xA;using them under any circumstance, and think even reading about them legally compromise&#xA;your ability to reimplement them yourselves, stop reading now&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is a follow-up to the &lt;a href=&#34;https://michel-slm.name/posts/2026-03-24-announcing-sandogasa-for-fedora-packaging-workflows/&#34;&gt;original Sandogasa announcement&lt;/a&gt;. Before I ended up &lt;a href=&#34;https://crates.io/crates/fedora-cve-triage&#34;&gt;&lt;code&gt;fedora-cve-triage&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt; to extract library crates and reuse them in the other Sandogasa tools, I already created two tools for managing CentOS Hyperscale SIG workflows, &lt;a href=&#34;https://crates.io/crates/hs-intake&#34;&gt;&lt;code&gt;hs-intake&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&#34;https://crates.io/crates/hs-relmon&#34;&gt;&lt;code&gt;hs-relmon&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. It simply makes sense to also merge them back in and deduplicate functionalities.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The D&amp;D alignments of developers w.r.t. AI</title>
      <link>/posts/2026-04-01-dnd-alignment-of-developers-wrt-ai/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/posts/2026-04-01-dnd-alignment-of-developers-wrt-ai/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I have a more serious post coming, but I figured better not risk being confused for a bad joke (especially given the &lt;a href=&#34;https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/67RIQBACH6FN6FGOTJPAXHX4YL5Q2HPG/&#34;&gt;chardet controversy&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;So instead - something I&amp;rsquo;ve been promising some people I would write about &amp;hellip; the idea that we can classify developers based on their attitude towards (generative) AI, a.k.a. LLMs.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Mind you, don&amp;rsquo;t take this too seriously, and especially, don&amp;rsquo;t feel singled out. I&amp;rsquo;m making fun of myself too here! Suggestions for improvements welcome, of course.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Announcing Sandogasa, a set of Rust crates to help with Fedora packaging workflows</title>
      <link>/posts/2026-03-24-announcing-sandogasa-for-fedora-packaging-workflows/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 19:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/posts/2026-03-24-announcing-sandogasa-for-fedora-packaging-workflows/</guid>
      <description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Caveat lector&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This post discusses tools reluctantly written with AI assistance. If you don&amp;rsquo;t entertain&#xA;using them under any circumstance, and think even reading about them legally compromise&#xA;your ability to reimplement them yourselves, stop reading now&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve spent the past few weeks of having to use LLMs to scratch some long-standing itches that, unfortunately, no one in the community has had the time to solve programmatically.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;fedora-cve-triage&#34;&gt;fedora-cve-triage&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;It started off with &lt;a href=&#34;https://crates.io/crates/fedora-cve-triage&#34;&gt;&lt;code&gt;fedora-cve-triage&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, written to address the issue that a lot of CVE bugs filed against Fedora packages are badly attributed, and there is a lack of automation for handling issues filed against CVEs that have been addressed in a software update but failed to reference said issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hi, my name is Michel, and I (reluctantly) use LLMs</title>
      <link>/posts/2026-03-24-my-name-is-michel-and-i-use-llms/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>/posts/2026-03-24-my-name-is-michel-and-i-use-llms/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br/&gt;  the old pen resists                                                                             &lt;br/&gt;  but the cursor blinks, waiting—&lt;br/&gt;  I press Enter. Fine.&lt;br/&gt;&#xA;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;~ Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context)&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;If you know where I work, you&amp;rsquo;ve probably heard of &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.hrgrapevine.com/us/content/article/2025-11-17-meta-to-formally-review-employees-ai-performance-from-2026&#34;&gt;news reports&lt;/a&gt; that we will be judged on AI-driven impact. I&amp;rsquo;ll let you drawn your own conclusion on how much truth there is in the reports, but you can listen to &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.hrgrapevine.com/us/content/article/2025-11-17-meta-to-formally-review-employees-ai-performance-from-2026&#34;&gt;what Zuck said about AI&lt;/a&gt; in a recent earnings report.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
